Calculation of properties¶
The COSMO-RS method allows to calculate the pseudochemical potential of a compound in the liquid phase \(\left( \mu_i ({T,\mathbf{x}}) \right)\), as well as in the gas phase \(\left( \mu_i^{gas}(T) \right)\), see the previous COSMO-RS theory section and Ref. [1]. In the ADF COSMO-RS implementation the following equations were used to calculate properties using these pseudochemical potential where \(\mu_i^{pure}\) and \(\mu_i^{solv}\) refers to the \(\mu_i ({T,\mathbf{x}})\) evaluated at the mole fraction of unity and the specified solvent composition, respectively. The detailed explanation of the variables can be found here.
The following sections will elaborate on the application of these equations, categorized according to the thermodynamic principles:
The above equations are not always exact, for example the vapor-liquid equilibrium properties assume perfect gas behavior.
Properties derived from pseudochemical potential in solution¶
The \(\mu_i^{res}\) represents the electrostatic interaction contribution and the \(\mu_i^{comb}\) accounts for the molecular size and shape difference between species. This pseudochemical potential is essential for predicting various properties in a liquid solution, including the activity coefficient (Eq. 10) and excess properties (Eqs. 12 and 13).
In the COSMO-RS method the volume of 1 molecule in the liquid phase is approximated with the volume of the molecule shaped cavity, that is used in the COSMO calculations. In this way it is possible to calculate the volume of 1 mole of solvent molecules in the liquid phase. However, for properties that depend on such volumes, one can also use (related) experimental data as input data for the calculation.
Starting from ADF2012 the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation is used to calculate the excess enthalpy of a mixture. Previously it was estimated using the misfit and hydrogen bonding energy of the mixture and its pure compounds.
Liquid-Liquid equilibrium properties¶
Please note the pseudochemical potential \(\mu_i\) do not include the \(RT \ln(x_i)\) term in a standard chemical potential, \(\left( \frac{\partial G}{\partial N_i} \right)_{T, P, N_{j \neq i}}\). As a result, the equation for the partition coefficinet (Eq. 24) should be derived from the equality of the standard chemical potential between the two liquid phase, as expressed in Eq. 26, as referenced in Ref. [2]:
In addition, the solubility of an insoluble liquid in a solvent can be further simplified using Eq. (27) and determined by solving Eq. (19). However in many cases, this assuption is invalid. A more accurate approach is solving the miscibility gap directly from Eq. (26). An example is given for the calculation miscibility gap in the binary mixture of Methanol and Hexane.
Vapor-Liquid equilibrium properties¶
The COSMO-RS and COSMO-SAC 2013-ADF have been parameterized for vapor pressure prediction. COSMO-RS provides a reliable approximation of the pseudochemical potential for a compound in the gas phase (perfect gas with a reference state of 1 bar) as expressed in Eq. (2) [1]. In this semi-empirical equation, \(E_i^{gas}\) is the gas phase bond energy, \(E_i^{COSMO}\) is the bond energy in a perfect conductor, \(\Delta E_i^{diel}\) is the dielectric energy correction, the rest terms are proposed as the dispersion energy, ring correction energy and the energy correction on reference state. The \(\gamma_k\) is the dispersive parameter of atom \(k\), \(A_i^{k}\) is the exposed surface area of atom \(k\), \(n_i^{ring}\) is the numbers of ring atoms, \(\omega\) and \(\eta\) are both model parameters.
The vapor pressure can then be estimated using Eq. (6), based on the ideal gas assumption and the equality of the standard chemical potential between the gas and liquid phases (Eq. 28 and Eq. 29). Alternatively, Eq. (29) can be reformulated in terms of the fugacity, as shown in Eq. (30). From this relation, various vapor-liquid equilibrium properties can be determined, such as Henry’s constant (Eqs 16, 17 and 18), gas solubility (Eq. 21) and solvation energy (Eq 23).
The boiling temperature of a solvent is determined using an iterative method, where the temperature is adjusted until the calculated vapor pressure falls within a certain threshold of the desired pressure.
Also experimental vapor pressure data for pure compounds can be incorporated as input to enhance the accuracy of these calculations. This approach will corrects \(\mu_i^{gas}\) throguh Eq (6) and improve the prediction accuracy on vapor-liquid equilibrium properties.
Solid-Liquid equilibrium properties¶
The solid solubility can be calculated from the solid-liquid equilibrium, as expressed in Eq. (31). It can be solved using Eq. (32) and Eq. (33), ultimately leading to Eq. (20) similar to Ref. [2]. Then the solid solubility can be calculation with an iterative method, since the activity coefficient \(\gamma_i\) depends on the molar fraction of this compound. The COSMO-RS method does not predict \(\Delta_{fus} H_i\), \(\Delta C_{p,i}\) , or \(T_{m,i}\). These need to be provide as input data for the solid solubility calculation. When experimental data is unavailable, the property prediction tool can be used to estimate \(\Delta_{fus} H_i\) and \(T_{m,i}\) while assume \(\Delta C_{p,i}=0\).
Quantity |
Meaning |
---|---|
\(R\) |
Gas constant |
\(T\) |
Temperature |
\(x_i\) |
The molar fraction of compound i in a liquid solution |
\(y_i\) |
The molar fraction of compound i in the gas phase |
\(w_i\) |
The mass fraction of compound i in a liquid solution |
\(M_i^{pure}\) |
The molar mass of the pure compound i |
\(M^{ave}\) |
The average molar mass of the mixture |
\(\gamma_i\) |
Activity coefficient of compound i in a liquid solution |
\(a_i\) |
Activity of compound i in a liquid solution |
\(P_i^{vap}\) |
The vapor pressure of the pure compound i |
\(P_i\) |
The partial vapor pressure of compound i |
\(P\) |
The total vapor pressure |
\(P_i^{gas}\) |
The specified partial pressure of gaseous solute compound i used in gas solubility calculations |
\(\mu_i^{gas}\) |
The pseudochemical potential of the pure compound i in the gas phase |
\(\mu_i^{pure}\) |
The pseudochemical potential of the pure compound i in the liquid phase, also as \(\mu_i(T, x_i = 1)\) |
\(\mu_i^{solv}\) |
The pseudochemical potential of compound i in a liquid solution, also as \(\mu_i(T, x_i = x^{solv})\) |
\(G^E\) |
The excess Gibbs free energy |
\(H^E\) |
The excess enthalpy, Gibbs-Helmholtz equation |
\(G^{mix}\) |
The Gibbs energy of mixing |
\(\Delta_{vap} H\) |
The enthalpy of vaporization, Clausius-Clapeyron equation |
\(E_i^{\text{HB pure}}\) |
The hydrogen bond energy of the pure compound i in the liquid phase, see Ref. [1] |
\(E_i^{\text{HB}}\) |
The partial hydrogen bond energy of compound i in a liquid solution |
\(E_i^{\text{misfit pure}}\) |
The misfit energy of the pure compound i in the liquid phase, see Ref. [1] |
\(E_i^{\text{misfit}}\) |
The partial misfit energy of compound i in a liquid solution |
\(\Delta G_{solv}^{\text{liq-solv}}\) |
The solvation Gibbs free energy from the pure compound liquid phase to the solvated phase |
\(\Delta G_{solv}^{\text{gas-solv}}\) |
The solvation Gibbs free energy from the pure compound gas phase to the solvated phase, with a reference state of 1 mol/L in both phases |
\(k_H\) |
Henry’s law constant: ratio between the liquid phase concentration of a compound and its partial vapor pressure in the gas phase |
\(k_H^{cc}\) |
dimensionless Henry’s law constant: ratio between the liquid phase concentration of a compound and its gas phase concentration |
\(k_{H~inv}^{px}\) |
Henry’s law constant, representing the volatility instead of the solubility, ratio between the partial vapor pressure of a compound in the gas phas and the molar fraction in the liquid phase |
\(V_{solvent}\) |
Volume of 1 mole of solvent molecules in the liquid phase |
\(V_{gas}\) |
Volume of 1 mole of molecules in the gas phase (at 1 atm, perfect gas) |
\(x_i^{\text{SOL(state)}}\) |
Solubility of solute compound i in a solvent (molar fraction) where state refers to the physical state of the solute (gas, liquid, or solid) |
\(\Delta_{fus} H_i\) |
The enthalpy of fusion of compound i |
\(\Delta C_{p,i}\) |
The \(\Delta\) heat capacity of fusion of compound i, \(C_{p}^{liq} - C_{p}^{solid}\) |
\(T_m\) |
The melting temperature of compound i |
\(log_{10} P_{\text{solv1/solv2}}\) |
The logarithm of the partition coefficient P, which is the ratio of the concentrations of a compound in two immiscible solvents, solvent 1 and solvent 2 |
\(LFL_i\) |
The flash point (lower flammable limit, LFL) of compound i |
\(LFL_{mix}\) |
The flash point (lower flammable limit, LFL) of a mixture, Le Chatelier’s mixing rule |
See also the COSMO-RS GUI tutorial for the calculation of the following properties:
Ionic liquids in COSMO-RS 2020
The activity coefficient of a compound i solvated in an ionic liquid is an important thermodynamic property. In COSMO-RS 2020 one can treat the ionic liquid as one compound, which means that the value of the activity coefficient is calculated in the standard way most applications report them. In particular, in COSMO-RS 2020 one can treat the ionic liquid as one compound, which only has the dissociated form.
Ionic liquids in COSMO-RS <=2019
The activity coefficient of a compound i solvated in an ionic liquid is an important thermodynamic property. The cation and anion, which have been treated separately, will be used in equal amounts to ensure an electroneutral mixture in the COSMO-RS calculation.
In other applications cation-anion pair have been treated as one molecule, however, below we will treat the cation and anion as two separate molecules, which is needed in older versions of COSMO-RS <=2019. This has consequences for the value of the activity coefficient.
For example, for a 1:1 IL (i.e., [A]+ [B]- ), the activity coefficient at a finite concentration of solute i in the binary mixture (IL + solute) can be calculated by
- γi bin = (γi tern xi tern )/xi bin = γi tern /(1+xIL bin )
where the superscript “tern” represents the hypothetical ternary system comprising cation, anion and solute i, with
- xcation tern = xanion tern
- xcation tern + xanion tern + xi tern = 1
and the superscript “bin” represents the binary mixture comprising solute and IL, with
- xIL bin + xi bin = 1
Accordingly, the activity coefficient of a solute i in the binary mixture (IL + solute) at infinite dilution is simplified as
- γi bin = 0.5 γi tern (at infinite dilution)
Thus in this case we should scale the activity coefficient at infinite dilution γi tern , which is directly obtained from the COSMO-RS calculation, with a factor of 0.5.
Similarly, for a ternary system comprising component i, component j and an ionic liquid, the activity coefficient at finite concentration of component i can be calculated by
- γi tern = γi quart /(1+xIL tern )
where the superscript “quart” represents the hypothetical quaternary system comprised of cation, anion, solute i and solute j, with:
- xcation quart = xanion quart
- xcation quart + xanion quart + xi quart + xj quart = 1
and the superscript “tern” represents the ternary mixture comprising solute i, j, and IL, with
- xIL tern + xi tern + xj tern = 1
References